It is a philosophical-ethical question that does not let you rest, because it is also considered a double standard according to reasoning errors. It is also a logical question. There are two major philosophy groups here at Facabook. One is closed and the other is open, but there is no significant difference between them. I have several topic proposals that were rejected in one, but in the other they were added to the site and were successful. The most basic philosophical question. It is neither political nor religious. What is the reason? What could be the reason that I didn't think of?

 

Filozófiai- etikai kérdés, ami nem hagy nyugodni, mert az érvelési hibák szerint kettős mércének is számít. Így logikai kérdés is. Van itt a Facabookon két nagyobb filozófia csoport. Az egyik zárt és a másik nyított, de nagyon más jelentős különbség nincs köztük. Több olyan témafelvetésem is van, amit az egyikben elutasítottak, de a másikban meg felkerült az oldalra és sikeres. A legalapabb filozófiai kérdéskör. Se nem politika, se nem vallási jelegű. Mi az oka? Mi lehet az oka, amire nem gondoltam? 

 

 

 

Problems around the concept of "existence":1. The given thing, the existence of which should be decided, is not precisely defined.2. The place or the environment where we should examine the existence of the given thing is not precisely defined.3. The form of existence is not precisely defined.4. The time interval in which the existence should be examined is not precisely defined.Without precisely clarifying and specifying these things, it is pointless to argue on scientific or logical grounds about the existence or non-existence of anything. Until then, it was a meaningless world of puns and pretending.- Problem-revealing questions: Is there a V.I. Lenin? Does Winnie the Pooh exist?

 

Problems around the concept of "existence":1. The given thing, the existence of which should be decided, is not precisely defined.2. The place or the environment where we should examine the existence of the given thing is not precisely defined.3. The form of existence is not precisely defined.4. The time interval in which the existence should be examined is not precisely defined- Without precisely clarifying and specifying these things, it is pointless to argue on scientific or logical grounds about the existence or non-existence of anything. Until then, it was a meaningless world of puns and pretending.