Biga Cubensis Creative Commons License 2014.09.01 0 0 73723
  • The video RU MOD provided was of the unified (ie civilian) traffic control system. 
  • That system conforms to most current computerised ATM systems found in EU, US, AU and many Asian countries. 
  • The display of MH17 (and others ) on the video is that of PSR and SSR data coupled with Flight Plan (FPL) data
  • The coupling process fails at the time of the missile strike, as evidenced by the appearance of a square. Logically, the result of catastrophic system failure on the aircraft is that the transponder fails to squawk the required code anymore, forcing a decouple.
  • what is left once the FPL decouples and the SSR data is gone due to transponder failure is the Primary Surveillance radar paint of MH17. This paint is co-located with the square from the Flight Plan, they diverge as the projected FPL position of MH17 moves away based on expected normal speed of a B777,  from its actual (damage and falling wreckage)  location  as per the PSR
  • The radar paint that the RU MOD tries to describe as the phantom SU25 is in fact the MH17 primary paint of what is now falling wreckage

 

van aki mást gondol persze:

eszerint a pontok, amiket az oroszok Szu-25-nek mondanak, nem más, mint a lezuhanó MH17 darabjainak radarnyomai :(

 

ha esetleg van itt, aki ért az ATM rendszerhez, megszakérthetné, hogy van-e a fenti okfejtésben valami, vagy marhaság.

részletek itt:

http://whoisstrelkov.wordpress.com/2014/07/23/russian-atc-lesson-101-the-phantom-su25/